Colombia vs Korea: Consumption of fixed capital (CFC), Ratio of this level of
Consumption of fixed capital (CFC), Ratio of this level of over time
- Colombia
- Korea
How they compare
Korea currently reports 0.5381 against 0.5167 in Colombia, a difference of 0.0214.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Korea ahead.
Colombia ranks 34th and Korea ranks 31st of 49 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.523 | 0.5399 | 0.017 | Korea |
| 2020s | 0.5167 | 0.5381 | 0.0214 | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher consumption of fixed capital (cfc), ratio of this level of, Colombia or Korea?
- Korea, at 0.5381 against 0.5167 in Colombia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in consumption of fixed capital (cfc), ratio of this level of between Colombia and Korea?
- 0.0214, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Korea?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do Colombia and Korea rank globally for consumption of fixed capital (cfc), ratio of this level of?
- Colombia ranks 34th and Korea ranks 31st of 49 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Consumption of fixed capital (CFC), Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.