Sweden vs Zimbabwe: Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with
Sweden
2
in 2025
Zimbabwe
2
in 2025
Sweden rank
1st
Zimbabwe rank
1st
Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with over time
- Sweden
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 2 against 2 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.
Sweden ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 205 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.8333 | 1.33 | 0.5 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 1.33 | 2 | 0.6667 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher countries with national human rights institutions in compliance with, Sweden or Zimbabwe?
- Sweden, at 2 against 2 in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in countries with national human rights institutions in compliance with between Sweden and Zimbabwe?
- 0, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Zimbabwe?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Sweden and Zimbabwe rank globally for countries with national human rights institutions in compliance with?
- Sweden ranks 1st and Zimbabwe ranks 1st of 205 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- United Nations Statistics Division, SDG Global Database, published as Countries with National Human Rights Institutions in compliance with the Paris Principles (0 = No status; 1 = Status B, partially compliant; 2 = Status A, fully compliant). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.