Afghanistan vs South Sudan: CPIA building human resources rating
CPIA building human resources rating over time
- Afghanistan
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2 1=low to 6=high in Afghanistan, a difference of 0.5 1=low to 6=high.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Afghanistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Afghanistan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 81st and South Sudan ranks 79th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.38 1=low to 6=high | 1.12 1=low to 6=high | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 2.3 1=low to 6=high | 2.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia building human resources rating, Afghanistan or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2 1=low to 6=high in Afghanistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia building human resources rating between Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 0.5 1=low to 6=high, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and South Sudan rank globally for cpia building human resources rating?
- Afghanistan ranks 81st and South Sudan ranks 79th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.