Azerbaijan vs Tanzania: CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Tanzania
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 17th and Tanzania ranks 17th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Azerbaijan averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia building human resources rating, Azerbaijan or Tanzania?
- Azerbaijan, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in cpia building human resources rating between Azerbaijan and Tanzania?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Tanzania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Azerbaijan and Tanzania rank globally for cpia building human resources rating?
- Azerbaijan ranks 17th and Tanzania ranks 17th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.