Burkina Faso vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): CPIA building human resources rating

Burkina Faso
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
2.6 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
39th
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank
40th

CPIA building human resources rating over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
01234200520152025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.6 1=low to 6=high in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0.9 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.3 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 21 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.

Burkina Faso ranks 39th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 40th of 85 countries.

Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
2000s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 3.24 1=low to 6=high 0.2583 1=low to 6=high Burkina Faso
2010s 3.65 1=low to 6=high 3.26 1=low to 6=high 0.3875 1=low to 6=high Burkina Faso
2020s 3.5 1=low to 6=high 2.94 1=low to 6=high 0.5597 1=low to 6=high Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia building human resources rating, Burkina Faso or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
Burkina Faso, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.6 1=low to 6=high in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia building human resources rating between Burkina Faso and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
0.9 1=low to 6=high, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for cpia building human resources rating?
Burkina Faso ranks 39th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 40th of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): CPIA building human resources rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-building-human-resources-rating-1-low-to-6-high/burkina-faso/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-building-human-resources-rating-1-low-to-6-high/burkina-faso/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/">Burkina Faso vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): CPIA building human resources rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.