Central African Republic vs Micronesia, Federated States of: CPIA building human resources rating
CPIA building human resources rating over time
- Central African Republic
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 66th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 66th of 85 countries.
Micronesia, Federated States of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.56 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.4444 1=low to 6=high | Micronesia, Federated States of |
| 2020s | 2.67 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.3333 1=low to 6=high | Micronesia, Federated States of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia building human resources rating, Central African Republic or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Central African Republic, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia building human resources rating between Central African Republic and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for cpia building human resources rating?
- Central African Republic ranks 66th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 66th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA building human resources rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The CPIA measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). The CPIA building human resources criterion assesses the national policies and public and private sector service delivery that affect access to and quality of health and education-related services. The criterion has two components: (a) health, including population and reproductive health, and nutrition as well as the prevention and treatment of communicable diseases such as HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria; and (b) education, training and literacy programs, and early child development (ECD) programs, including both formal and non-formal programs (which may combine education, health, and nutrition interventions) aimed at children aged 0-6.