Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Senegal: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Senegal
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Senegal, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Senegal has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 6th and Senegal ranks 6th of 85 countries.
Senegal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia, Plurinational State of | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.2 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Senegal |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Senegal?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Senegal as of 2015.
- What is the difference in cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Senegal?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Senegal?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Senegal rank globally for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 6th and Senegal ranks 6th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.