Central African Republic vs Marshall Islands: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating over time
- Central African Republic
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 68th and Marshall Islands ranks 68th of 85 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.61 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.1111 1=low to 6=high | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating, Central African Republic or Marshall Islands?
- Central African Republic, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating between Central African Republic and Marshall Islands?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Marshall Islands?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Marshall Islands rank globally for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Central African Republic ranks 68th and Marshall Islands ranks 68th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.