Congo vs Grenada: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating over time
- Congo
- Grenada
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Grenada, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 49th and Grenada ranks 49th of 85 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Grenada |
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | Grenada |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating, Congo or Grenada?
- Congo, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating between Congo and Grenada?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Grenada?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Grenada rank globally for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Congo ranks 49th and Grenada ranks 49th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.