Cote d'Ivoire vs Vietnam: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Vietnam
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Vietnam, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 6th and Vietnam ranks 6th of 85 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Vietnam in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating, Cote d'Ivoire or Vietnam?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 4 1=low to 6=high in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating between Cote d'Ivoire and Vietnam?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Vietnam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Vietnam rank globally for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 6th and Vietnam ranks 6th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.