Latin America & Caribbean vs Papua New Guinea: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating

Latin America & Caribbean
3.2 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Latin America & Caribbean rank
23rd
Papua New Guinea rank
22nd

CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating over time

  • Latin America & Caribbean
  • Papua New Guinea
01234200520152025

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.2 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean, a difference of 0.3 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Latin America & Caribbean's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Latin America & Caribbean ahead.

Latin America & Caribbean ranks 23rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 42 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latin America & Caribbean averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latin America & Caribbean Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 3.66 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 0.1556 1=low to 6=high Latin America & Caribbean
2010s 3.69 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 0.1882 1=low to 6=high Latin America & Caribbean
2020s 3.43 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 0.0729 1=low to 6=high Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating, Latin America & Caribbean or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.2 1=low to 6=high in Latin America & Caribbean as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating between Latin America & Caribbean and Papua New Guinea?
0.3 1=low to 6=high, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latin America & Caribbean and Papua New Guinea?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do Latin America & Caribbean and Papua New Guinea rank globally for cpia efficiency of revenue mobilization rating?
Latin America & Caribbean ranks 23rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 22nd of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latin America & Caribbean vs Papua New Guinea: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-efficiency-of-revenue-mobilization-rating-1-low-to-6-high/latin-america-and-caribbean/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-efficiency-of-revenue-mobilization-rating-1-low-to-6-high/latin-america-and-caribbean/papua-new-guinea/">Latin America & Caribbean vs Papua New Guinea: CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA efficiency of revenue mobilization rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

The Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA) measures the extent to which a country’s policy and institutional framework supports sustainable growth and poverty reduction, and consequently the effective use of development assistance. The outcome of the exercise yields both an overall score and scores for sixteen criteria that compose the CPIA. These criteria include: A. Economic Management (1. Monetary and Exchange Rate Policies; 2. Fiscal Policy; 3. Debt Policy and Management), B. Structural Policies (4. Trade; 5. Financial Sector; 6. Business Regulatory Environment), C. Policies for Social Inclusion/Equity (7. Gender equality; 8. Equity of public resource use; 9. Building human resources; 10. Social protection and labor; 11. Policies and institutions for environmental sustainability), D. Public Sector Management and Institutions (12. Property rights and rule-based governance; 13. Quality of budgetary and financial management; 14. Efficiency of revenue mobilization; 15. Quality of public administration; 16. Transparency, accountability, and corruption in the public sector). This Efficiency of Revenue Mobilization criterion assesses the overall pattern of revenue mobilization, not only the tax structure as it exists on paper, but revenue from all sources as they are collected. Separate sub-ratings are provided for (a) tax policy and (b) tax administration.