Afghanistan vs Eritrea: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Afghanistan
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Eritrea
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Afghanistan rank
75th
Eritrea rank
75th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Afghanistan
- Eritrea
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Eritrea, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Eritrea ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 75th and Eritrea ranks 75th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.62 1=low to 6=high | 2.88 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | Afghanistan |
| 2020s | 2.4 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Afghanistan or Eritrea?
- Afghanistan, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Eritrea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Afghanistan and Eritrea?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Eritrea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Afghanistan and Eritrea rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Afghanistan ranks 75th and Eritrea ranks 75th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.