Armenia vs Bhutan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Armenia
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Bhutan
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Armenia rank
1st
Bhutan rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Armenia
- Bhutan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Bhutan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 1st and Bhutan ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bhutan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Armenia |
| 2010s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.38 1=low to 6=high | 0.125 1=low to 6=high | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Armenia or Bhutan?
- Armenia, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Bhutan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Armenia and Bhutan?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bhutan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Armenia and Bhutan rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Armenia ranks 1st and Bhutan ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.