What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Armenia and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?

0.62 1=low to 6=high, with Armenia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?

9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.

Where does this data come from?

CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Armenia vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA equity of public resource use rating

Armenia

4.5 1=low to 6=high

in 2013

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

3.88 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

Armenia rank

1st

Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank

1st

CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time

Armenia
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.88 1=low to 6=high in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.62 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 1st and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 1st of 85 countries.

Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Armenia	Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)	Difference	Ahead
2000s	4.5 1=low to 6=high	3.7 1=low to 6=high	0.8044 1=low to 6=high	Armenia
2010s	4.5 1=low to 6=high	3.85 1=low to 6=high	0.651 1=low to 6=high	Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Armenia or Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?: Armenia, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.88 1=low to 6=high in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2013.
What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Armenia and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?: 0.62 1=low to 6=high, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?: 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Armenia and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?: Armenia ranks 1st and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Where does this data come from?: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Armenia vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA equity of public resource use rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/armenia/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/armenia/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">Armenia vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): CPIA equity of public resource use rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit: 1=low to 6=high
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.