Armenia vs Tanzania: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Armenia
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Tanzania
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Armenia rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Armenia
- Tanzania
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Armenia |
| 2010s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Armenia or Tanzania?
- Armenia, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Armenia and Tanzania?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Tanzania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Armenia and Tanzania rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Armenia ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.