Azerbaijan vs IDA blend: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Azerbaijan
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2010
IDA blend
3.45 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
13th
IDA blend rank
14th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Azerbaijan
- IDA blend
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.45 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend, a difference of 0.55 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Azerbaijan's figure about 1.2 times IDA blend's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Azerbaijan has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 13th and IDA blend ranks 14th of 85 countries.
Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | IDA blend | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | 0.7448 1=low to 6=high | Azerbaijan |
| 2010s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 0.6333 1=low to 6=high | Azerbaijan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Azerbaijan or IDA blend?
- Azerbaijan, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.45 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend as of 2010.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Azerbaijan and IDA blend?
- 0.55 1=low to 6=high, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and IDA blend?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2010.
- How do Azerbaijan and IDA blend rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Azerbaijan ranks 13th and IDA blend ranks 14th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.