Bangladesh vs Burundi: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Bangladesh
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Burundi
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
30th
Burundi rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Bangladesh
- Burundi
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Burundi, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 30th and Burundi ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Burundi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Burundi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.15 1=low to 6=high | Burundi |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Bangladesh or Burundi?
- Bangladesh, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Burundi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Bangladesh and Burundi?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Burundi?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Burundi rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Bangladesh ranks 30th and Burundi ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.