Bangladesh vs Ethiopia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Bangladesh
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Ethiopia
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Bangladesh rank
30th
Ethiopia rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Bangladesh
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Ethiopia, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 30th and Ethiopia ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 1 1=low to 6=high | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 3.55 1=low to 6=high | 4.05 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Bangladesh or Ethiopia?
- Bangladesh, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Ethiopia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Bangladesh and Ethiopia?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Ethiopia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bangladesh and Ethiopia rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Bangladesh ranks 30th and Ethiopia ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.