Bhutan vs IBRD only: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Bhutan
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
IBRD only
3.75 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Bhutan rank
1st
IBRD only rank
4th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Bhutan
- IBRD only
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only, a difference of 0.75 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 1st and IBRD only ranks 4th of 85 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.77 1=low to 6=high | 0.2331 1=low to 6=high | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 4.45 1=low to 6=high | 3.79 1=low to 6=high | 0.6608 1=low to 6=high | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Bhutan or IBRD only?
- Bhutan, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Bhutan and IBRD only?
- 0.75 1=low to 6=high, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and IBRD only?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and IBRD only rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Bhutan ranks 1st and IBRD only ranks 4th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.