Bhutan vs Mauritania: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Bhutan
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mauritania
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Bhutan rank
1st
Mauritania rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Bhutan
- Mauritania
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Mauritania, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bhutan ahead.
Bhutan ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.6 1=low to 6=high | Bhutan |
| 2010s | 4.45 1=low to 6=high | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | Bhutan |
| 2020s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.42 1=low to 6=high | 0.0833 1=low to 6=high | Bhutan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Bhutan or Mauritania?
- Bhutan, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Mauritania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Bhutan and Mauritania?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Mauritania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Mauritania rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Bhutan ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.