Burundi vs Cape Verde: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Burundi
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Cape Verde
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Burundi rank
30th
Cape Verde rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Burundi
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Cape Verde, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Burundi ranks 30th and Cape Verde ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Cape Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 1.2 1=low to 6=high | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 0.1 1=low to 6=high | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Burundi or Cape Verde?
- Burundi, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Cape Verde as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Burundi and Cape Verde?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Cape Verde?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Burundi and Cape Verde rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Burundi ranks 30th and Cape Verde ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.