Cape Verde vs Ethiopia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Cape Verde
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Ethiopia
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
30th
Ethiopia rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Cape Verde
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Ethiopia, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Ethiopia has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 30th and Ethiopia ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 4.05 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Cape Verde or Ethiopia?
- Cape Verde, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Ethiopia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Cape Verde and Ethiopia?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Ethiopia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Ethiopia rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Cape Verde ranks 30th and Ethiopia ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.