Cape Verde vs Nepal: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Cape Verde
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Nepal
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
30th
Nepal rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Cape Verde
- Nepal
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Nepal, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Cape Verde ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.9 1=low to 6=high | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 3.8 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 0.0833 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Cape Verde or Nepal?
- Cape Verde, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Cape Verde and Nepal?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Nepal?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Nepal rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Cape Verde ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.