Central African Republic vs Myanmar: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Central African Republic
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Myanmar
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
55th
Myanmar rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Central African Republic
- Myanmar
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Myanmar, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 55th and Myanmar ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.07 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.4286 1=low to 6=high | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 2.42 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.5833 1=low to 6=high | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Central African Republic or Myanmar?
- Central African Republic, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Central African Republic and Myanmar?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Myanmar?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Myanmar rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Central African Republic ranks 55th and Myanmar ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.