Congo vs Papua New Guinea: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Congo
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Congo rank
55th
Papua New Guinea rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Congo
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Congo ranks 55th and Papua New Guinea ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 0.6 1=low to 6=high | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 0.75 1=low to 6=high | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
- Congo, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Congo ranks 55th and Papua New Guinea ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.