Congo vs Timor-Leste: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Congo
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Timor-Leste
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Congo rank
55th
Timor-Leste rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Congo
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 20 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 55th and Timor-Leste ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Timor-Leste has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Congo or Timor-Leste?
- Congo, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Congo and Timor-Leste?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Timor-Leste?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Timor-Leste rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Congo ranks 55th and Timor-Leste ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.