Congo vs East Timor: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Congo
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Timor
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Congo rank
55th
East Timor rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Congo
- East Timor
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in East Timor, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 20 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 55th and East Timor ranks 55th of 85 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
| 2010s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 3.45 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.42 1=low to 6=high | 0.1667 1=low to 6=high | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Congo or East Timor?
- Congo, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Congo and East Timor?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and East Timor?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Congo and East Timor rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Congo ranks 55th and East Timor ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.