Congo vs Tuvalu: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Congo
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Tuvalu
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Congo rank
55th
Tuvalu rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Congo
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Congo currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Congo ranks 55th and Tuvalu ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Congo or Tuvalu?
- Congo, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Tuvalu as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Congo and Tuvalu?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tuvalu?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Tuvalu rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Congo ranks 55th and Tuvalu ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.