Cote d'Ivoire vs Tanzania: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Cote d'Ivoire
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Tanzania
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Tanzania
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.6 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 2.4 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 1.2 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania |
| 2020s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.08 1=low to 6=high | 0.0833 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Cote d'Ivoire or Tanzania?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Tanzania rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.