Côte d'Ivoire vs Togo: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Côte d'Ivoire
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Togo
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Côte d'Ivoire rank
1st
Togo rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Togo
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Togo, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Togo ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.6 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 0.4 1=low to 6=high | Togo |
| 2010s | 2.8 1=low to 6=high | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | Togo |
| 2020s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Côte d'Ivoire or Togo?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Togo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Côte d'Ivoire and Togo?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Togo?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Togo rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and Togo ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.