Djibouti vs Kosovo: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Djibouti
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Kosovo
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Djibouti rank
30th
Kosovo rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Djibouti
- Kosovo
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Kosovo ahead.
Djibouti ranks 30th and Kosovo ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Kosovo in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 0.3333 1=low to 6=high | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Djibouti or Kosovo?
- Djibouti, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Djibouti and Kosovo?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kosovo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Djibouti and Kosovo rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Djibouti ranks 30th and Kosovo ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.