Djibouti vs Republic of Moldova: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Djibouti
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Republic of Moldova
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Djibouti rank
30th
Republic of Moldova rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Djibouti
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Republic of Moldova has been ahead every year.
Djibouti ranks 30th and Republic of Moldova ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Republic of Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Republic of Moldova |
| 2010s | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.65 1=low to 6=high | Republic of Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Djibouti or Republic of Moldova?
- Djibouti, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Republic of Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Djibouti and Republic of Moldova?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Republic of Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Djibouti and Republic of Moldova rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Djibouti ranks 30th and Republic of Moldova ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.