Dominica vs Laos: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Dominica
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Laos
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Dominica rank
55th
Laos rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Dominica
- Laos
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Laos, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 55th and Laos ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Laos |
| 2010s | 3.2 1=low to 6=high | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 0.55 1=low to 6=high | Laos |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Dominica or Laos?
- Dominica, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Laos as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Dominica and Laos?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Laos?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Dominica and Laos rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Dominica ranks 55th and Laos ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.