East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Moldova: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Moldova
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.18 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Moldova ahead.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Moldova ranks 30th of 42 groups.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.46 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.0432 1=low to 6=high | Moldova |
| 2010s | 3.41 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.2889 1=low to 6=high | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Moldova?
- Moldova, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Moldova?
- 0.18 1=low to 6=high, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Moldova rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Moldova ranks 30th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.