East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Nepal: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
3.32 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Nepal
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
30th
Nepal rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.18 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 30th of 42 groups.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.46 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.1432 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
| 2010s | 3.41 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.5889 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
| 2020s | 3.33 1=low to 6=high | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Nepal?
- 0.18 1=low to 6=high, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Nepal?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Nepal rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Nepal ranks 30th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.