East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Sierra Leone: CPIA equity of public resource use rating

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
3.32 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sierra Leone
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
30th
Sierra Leone rank
30th

CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Sierra Leone
01234200520152025

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.18 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Sierra Leone ranks 30th of 42 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 1 and Sierra Leone in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Sierra Leone Difference Ahead
2000s 3.46 1=low to 6=high 3 1=low to 6=high 0.4568 1=low to 6=high East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 3.41 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 0.0889 1=low to 6=high Sierra Leone
2020s 3.33 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 0.1667 1=low to 6=high Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Sierra Leone?
Sierra Leone, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sierra Leone?
0.18 1=low to 6=high, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sierra Leone?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Sierra Leone rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 30th and Sierra Leone ranks 30th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Sierra Leone: CPIA equity of public resource use rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/sierra-leone/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/sierra-leone/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Sierra Leone: CPIA equity of public resource use rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.