East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Grenada: CPIA equity of public resource use rating

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
3.32 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Grenada
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
30th
Grenada rank
30th

CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
  • Grenada
01234200520152025

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.18 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Grenada's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and Grenada ranks 30th of 42 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) Grenada Difference Ahead
2000s 3.46 1=low to 6=high 3.5 1=low to 6=high 0.0432 1=low to 6=high Grenada
2010s 3.41 1=low to 6=high 3.3 1=low to 6=high 0.1111 1=low to 6=high East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
2020s 3.33 1=low to 6=high 3.25 1=low to 6=high 0.0833 1=low to 6=high East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Grenada?
Grenada, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Grenada?
0.18 1=low to 6=high, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Grenada?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Grenada rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 30th and Grenada ranks 30th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Grenada: CPIA equity of public resource use rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/grenada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific-ida-and-ibrd-countries/grenada/">East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Grenada: CPIA equity of public resource use rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.