East Asia & Pacific vs Saint Lucia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating

East Asia & Pacific
3.32 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Saint Lucia
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific rank
30th
Saint Lucia rank
30th

CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time

  • East Asia & Pacific
  • Saint Lucia
01234200520152025

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 0.18 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

East Asia & Pacific ranks 30th and Saint Lucia ranks 30th of 42 groups.

Saint Lucia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.46 1=low to 6=high 3.8 1=low to 6=high 0.3432 1=low to 6=high Saint Lucia
2010s 3.41 1=low to 6=high 3.85 1=low to 6=high 0.4389 1=low to 6=high Saint Lucia
2020s 3.33 1=low to 6=high 3.92 1=low to 6=high 0.5833 1=low to 6=high Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, East Asia & Pacific or Saint Lucia?
Saint Lucia, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.32 1=low to 6=high in East Asia & Pacific as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between East Asia & Pacific and Saint Lucia?
0.18 1=low to 6=high, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Saint Lucia?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific and Saint Lucia rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
East Asia & Pacific ranks 30th and Saint Lucia ranks 30th of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific vs Saint Lucia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/east-asia-and-pacific/st-lucia/">East Asia & Pacific vs Saint Lucia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit
1=low to 6=high
Source
CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.