Eritrea vs Solomon Islands: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Eritrea
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Solomon Islands
2.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Eritrea rank
75th
Solomon Islands rank
75th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Eritrea
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Eritrea currently reports 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Eritrea ranks 75th and Solomon Islands ranks 75th of 85 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.9 1=low to 6=high | 2.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.3 1=low to 6=high | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Eritrea or Solomon Islands?
- Eritrea, at 2.5 1=low to 6=high against 2.5 1=low to 6=high in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Eritrea and Solomon Islands?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Eritrea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Solomon Islands?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Eritrea and Solomon Islands rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Eritrea ranks 75th and Solomon Islands ranks 75th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.