Ethiopia vs Kosovo: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Ethiopia
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Kosovo
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Ethiopia rank
30th
Kosovo rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Ethiopia
- Kosovo
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Ethiopia ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 30th and Kosovo ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Ethiopia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 1 1=low to 6=high | Ethiopia |
| 2010s | 4.05 1=low to 6=high | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 1 1=low to 6=high | Ethiopia |
| 2020s | 3.67 1=low to 6=high | 3.17 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Ethiopia or Kosovo?
- Ethiopia, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Kosovo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Ethiopia and Kosovo?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Kosovo?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Ethiopia and Kosovo rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Ethiopia ranks 30th and Kosovo ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.