Gambia vs Tajikistan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Gambia
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Tajikistan
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Gambia rank
30th
Tajikistan rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Gambia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Gambia ranks 30th and Tajikistan ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.1 1=low to 6=high | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 3.35 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.58 1=low to 6=high | 0.3333 1=low to 6=high | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Gambia or Tajikistan?
- Gambia, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Gambia and Tajikistan?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Tajikistan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Tajikistan rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Gambia ranks 30th and Tajikistan ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.