Georgia vs Mauritania: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Georgia
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2013
Mauritania
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Georgia rank
1st
Mauritania rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Georgia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Mauritania, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 85 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.4 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 1 1=low to 6=high | Georgia |
| 2010s | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 0.75 1=low to 6=high | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Georgia or Mauritania?
- Georgia, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 4.5 1=low to 6=high in Mauritania as of 2013.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Georgia and Mauritania?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mauritania?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Georgia and Mauritania rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Georgia ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.