Ghana vs Sri Lanka: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Ghana
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sri Lanka
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Ghana rank
55th
Sri Lanka rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Ghana
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 55th and Sri Lanka ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Ghana |
| 2010s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3.12 1=low to 6=high | 0.125 1=low to 6=high | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Ghana or Sri Lanka?
- Ghana, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Ghana and Sri Lanka?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Sri Lanka?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Ghana and Sri Lanka rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Ghana ranks 55th and Sri Lanka ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.