Grenada vs Liberia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Grenada
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Liberia
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Grenada rank
30th
Liberia rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Grenada
- Liberia
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Liberia, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 30th and Liberia ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Grenada |
| 2010s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.65 1=low to 6=high | 0.35 1=low to 6=high | Liberia |
| 2020s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.25 1=low to 6=high | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Grenada or Liberia?
- Grenada, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Liberia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Grenada and Liberia?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Liberia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Liberia rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Grenada ranks 30th and Liberia ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.