Grenada vs Moldova: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Grenada
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Moldova
3.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Grenada rank
30th
Moldova rank
30th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- Grenada
- Moldova
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Moldova, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 30th and Moldova ranks 30th of 85 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010s | 3.3 1=low to 6=high | 3.7 1=low to 6=high | 0.4 1=low to 6=high | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Grenada or Moldova?
- Grenada, at 3.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.5 1=low to 6=high in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Grenada and Moldova?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Moldova?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Moldova rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Grenada ranks 30th and Moldova ranks 30th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.