Guinea-Bissau vs Sudan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Guinea-Bissau
2 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Sudan
1.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
83rd
Sudan rank
85th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Sudan
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2 1=low to 6=high against 1.5 1=low to 6=high in Sudan, a difference of 0.5 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.3 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 83rd and Sudan ranks 85th of 85 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.5 1=low to 6=high | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 2.3 1=low to 6=high | 2.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Sudan |
| 2020s | 2 1=low to 6=high | 2 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Guinea-Bissau or Sudan?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 2 1=low to 6=high against 1.5 1=low to 6=high in Sudan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Guinea-Bissau and Sudan?
- 0.5 1=low to 6=high, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Sudan?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Sudan rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 83rd and Sudan ranks 85th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.