Guyana vs Mozambique: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
Guyana
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mozambique
3 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Guyana rank
55th
Mozambique rank
55th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- Guyana
- Mozambique
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Mozambique, a difference of 0 1=low to 6=high.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.
Guyana ranks 55th and Mozambique ranks 55th of 85 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
| 2010s | 3.25 1=low to 6=high | 3.05 1=low to 6=high | 0.2 1=low to 6=high | Guyana |
| 2020s | 3 1=low to 6=high | 3 1=low to 6=high | 0 1=low to 6=high | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, Guyana or Mozambique?
- Guyana, at 3 1=low to 6=high against 3 1=low to 6=high in Mozambique as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between Guyana and Mozambique?
- 0 1=low to 6=high, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Mozambique?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do Guyana and Mozambique rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- Guyana ranks 55th and Mozambique ranks 55th of 85 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.