IBRD only vs Tanzania: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
IBRD only
3.75 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Tanzania
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
IBRD only rank
4th
Tanzania rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high) over time
- IBRD only
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only, a difference of 0.75 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 4th and Tanzania ranks 1st of 42 groups.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.77 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.2331 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 3.79 1=low to 6=high | 4 1=low to 6=high | 0.2108 1=low to 6=high | Tanzania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IBRD only or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IBRD only and Tanzania?
- 0.75 1=low to 6=high, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Tanzania?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do IBRD only and Tanzania rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- IBRD only ranks 4th and Tanzania ranks 1st of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.