Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IBRD only or Tanzania, United Republic of?

Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only as of 2025.

What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IBRD only and Tanzania, United Republic of?

0.75 1=low to 6=high, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Tanzania, United Republic of?

15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.

Where does this data come from?

CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

IBRD only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: CPIA equity of public resource use rating

IBRD only

3.75 1=low to 6=high

in 2019

Tanzania, United Republic of

4.5 1=low to 6=high

in 2025

IBRD only rank

4th

Tanzania, United Republic of rank

1st

CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time

IBRD only
Tanzania, United Republic of

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only, a difference of 0.75 1=low to 6=high.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Tanzania, United Republic of has been ahead every year.

IBRD only ranks 4th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st of 42 groups.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	IBRD only	Tanzania, United Republic of	Difference	Ahead
2000s	3.77 1=low to 6=high	4 1=low to 6=high	0.2331 1=low to 6=high	Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s	3.79 1=low to 6=high	4 1=low to 6=high	0.2108 1=low to 6=high	Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IBRD only or Tanzania, United Republic of?: Tanzania, United Republic of, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only as of 2025.
What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IBRD only and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 0.75 1=low to 6=high, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Tanzania, United Republic of?: 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
How do IBRD only and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?: IBRD only ranks 4th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 1st of 42 groups.
Where does this data come from?: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IBRD only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: CPIA equity of public resource use rating. Statizoid, drawing on CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/ibrd-only/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/cpia-equity-of-public-resource-use-rating-1-low-to-6-high/ibrd-only/tanzania/">IBRD only vs Tanzania, United Republic of: CPIA equity of public resource use rating</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high)
Unit: 1=low to 6=high
Source: CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 127 places, 2,460 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed: 03 September 2026

Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.