IBRD only vs Uzbekistan: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
IBRD only
3.75 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Uzbekistan
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
IBRD only rank
4th
Uzbekistan rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- IBRD only
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only, a difference of 0.75 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was IBRD only ahead.
IBRD only ranks 4th and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 42 groups.
IBRD only has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.77 1=low to 6=high | 3.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.2669 1=low to 6=high | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 3.79 1=low to 6=high | 3.75 1=low to 6=high | 0.0392 1=low to 6=high | IBRD only |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IBRD only or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only as of 2025.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IBRD only and Uzbekistan?
- 0.75 1=low to 6=high, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Uzbekistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do IBRD only and Uzbekistan rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- IBRD only ranks 4th and Uzbekistan ranks 1st of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.