IBRD only vs Viet Nam: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
IBRD only
3.75 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
Viet Nam
4.5 1=low to 6=high
in 2015
IBRD only rank
4th
Viet Nam rank
1st
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- IBRD only
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only, a difference of 0.75 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 42 groups.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.77 1=low to 6=high | 4.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.6331 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 3.9 1=low to 6=high | 4.5 1=low to 6=high | 0.6014 1=low to 6=high | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IBRD only or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 4.5 1=low to 6=high against 3.75 1=low to 6=high in IBRD only as of 2015.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IBRD only and Viet Nam?
- 0.75 1=low to 6=high, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Viet Nam?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do IBRD only and Viet Nam rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- IBRD only ranks 4th and Viet Nam ranks 1st of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.