IDA blend vs Mongolia: CPIA equity of public resource use rating
IDA blend
3.45 1=low to 6=high
in 2025
Mongolia
4 1=low to 6=high
in 2019
IDA blend rank
14th
Mongolia rank
13th
CPIA equity of public resource use rating over time
- IDA blend
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.45 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend, a difference of 0.55 1=low to 6=high.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times IDA blend's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.
IDA blend ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 42 groups.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA blend | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.16 1=low to 6=high | 3.4 1=low to 6=high | 0.2448 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 3.37 1=low to 6=high | 3.6 1=low to 6=high | 0.2267 1=low to 6=high | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cpia equity of public resource use rating, IDA blend or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 4 1=low to 6=high against 3.45 1=low to 6=high in IDA blend as of 2019.
- What is the difference in cpia equity of public resource use rating between IDA blend and Mongolia?
- 0.55 1=low to 6=high, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA blend and Mongolia?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2019.
- How do IDA blend and Mongolia rank globally for cpia equity of public resource use rating?
- IDA blend ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 13th of 42 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- CPIA database, World Bank Group (WBG), published as CPIA equity of public resource use rating (1=low to 6=high). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Equity of public resource use assesses the extent to which the pattern of public expenditures and revenue collection affects the poor and is consistent with national poverty reduction priorities.